| |
Author
|
Topic: I must be a homophobe (Read 901 times)
|
Change
Knight
 
Posts: 57
Free Speaker
|
I never said it was beneficial to reproduction, clearly it isn't.
But then neither is birth control, do you have a problem with that?
Actually there is an argument that homosexuality is benificial to reproduction, but I won't bore you with it. It's only a theory. |
|
|
|
|
Richard Lionheart
Queen

Posts: 1891

The truth is the truth. Tough.
|
And if everyone used birth control then we'd go extinct wouldn't we?
indeed, but birth control is a thing you can turn on and off voluntarily when you decide you want kids. The same cant be said for homosexuality. |
It's my opinion and no, before you ask, I am not going to post "evidence" because there usually isn't any, or you can go and find it for yourself. Why should I do your research?
Remember, never trust a moslem - Muslims can lie for Allah ―Surah 5:89, Surah 2:225, Surah 16: 106.
|
|
|
Richard Lionheart
Queen

Posts: 1891

The truth is the truth. Tough.
|
Actually there is an argument that homosexuality is benificial to reproduction, but I won't bore you with it. It's only a theory.
theres also a theory that communism is beneficial to mankind, but i suspect it has the same validity as your theory. |
|
|
|
|
Happy Hornet
King

Posts: 3724
Free Speaker
|
indeed, but birth control is a thing you can turn on and off voluntarily when you decide you want kids. The same cant be said for homosexuality.
Actually a gay person can have kids anytime they want, plenty of them do, Rich is living proof of that.
Which leaves us with my original conclusion that in principle there is no difference between a gay couple and a straight couple using birth control, in both instances they are having sex for recreation not procreation. |
|
|
|
|
stonefish
King

Posts: 4381

Free Speaker
|
Which leaves us with my original conclusion that in principle there is no difference between a gay couple and a straight couple using birth control, in both instances they are having sex for recreation not procreation. Except of course when hetero couples do it to procreate,that does happen occassionally you know
Maybe someone should tell gays,it aint gonna happen for them? |
|
|
|
|
Happy Hornet
King

Posts: 3724
Free Speaker
|
Except of course when hetero couples do it to procreate,that does happen occassionally you know
Maybe someone should tell gays,it aint gonna happen for them?
True but that's not intentional, and the human race would soon die out if we were relying on the odd accident to keep us going. |
|
|
|
|
papasmurf
King

Posts: 20692

|
True but that's not intentional, and the human race would soon die out if we were relying on the odd accident to keep us going.
"Most people are caused by accidents" (Far Canal T-Shirts) |
|
|
|
|
Richard Lionheart
Queen

Posts: 1891

The truth is the truth. Tough.
|
Actually a gay person can have kids anytime they want, plenty of them do, Rich is living proof of that.
Which leaves us with my original conclusion that in principle there is no difference between a gay couple and a straight couple using birth control, in both instances they are having sex for recreation not procreation.
no they cant.
Please demonstrate the theory of how you make a baby with two sperms, or two eggs.
me and the rest of the scientific community will be most interested in your new breakthrough.
I like the way you avoided the base issue in the last paragraph, so let me drag you back onto it. Homosexuality is abnormal because it woudl ultimately result in the extinction of the species if we all adopted such proclivities overnight, as the only function of being here is to create the next generation, which is why were still here after 7 million or so years. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 21, 2010, 19:27:36 by Richard Lionheart »
|
|
|
|
|
Happy Hornet
King

Posts: 3724
Free Speaker
|
no they cant.
Please demonstrate the theory of how you make a baby with two sperms, or two eggs.
me and the rest of the scientific community will be most interested in your new breakthrough.
I didn't say a gay couple could, I said a gay PERSON could.
You say that a hetrosexual couple on birth control can stop anytime they want and have children.
Well a gay man could have a child with a woman same as a straight man could any time he wanted, ditto a gay woman with a straight man.
|
|
|
|
|
Change
Knight
 
Posts: 57
Free Speaker
|
theres also a theory that communism is beneficial to mankind, but i suspect it has the same validity as your theory.
Could be. (I should point out I can't take credit for the theory.) |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 21, 2010, 22:15:25 by Change »
|
|
|
|
|
Happy Hornet
King

Posts: 3724
Free Speaker
|
I like the way you avoided the base issue in the last paragraph, so let me drag you back onto it. Homosexuality is abnormal because it woudl ultimately result in the extinction of the species if we all adopted such proclivities overnight, as the only function of being here is to create the next generation, which is why were still here after 7 million or so years.
Yes because "what if we were all gay" is a ridiculous argument.
You may as well argue "what if Thursday didn't exist?"
We're are not all going to turn gay tomorrow, just as all the world's fertile women are not ALL going to go on the pill tomorrow for the rest of their lives (which would spell the end of our species just as certainly) that being the case, what is the harm in recreational sex of any kind between two consenting adults? |
|
|
|
|
LeftLibertarian
Getting digits in the wrong order since 9187
Queen

Posts: 1478

Unaffiliated
|
no they cant.
Please demonstrate the theory of how you make a baby with two sperms, or two eggs.
me and the rest of the scientific community will be most interested in your new breakthrough.
I like the way you avoided the base issue in the last paragraph, so let me drag you back onto it. Homosexuality is abnormal because it woudl ultimately result in the extinction of the species if we all adopted such proclivities overnight, as the only function of being here is to create the next generation, which is why were still here after 7 million or so years.
And how likely would you say that is?
On a scale of one to "never going to happen, not that it matters because anyone who engages in sexual intercourse purely for procreative purposes is mad"?
Your argument bears no relevance to real life. Some people are gay, and this will always be the case whatever tag you attach to it. Most people are not, have no wish to be and cannot be turned by this imaginary recruitment propaganda fruitcakes like you see everywhere. You might as well argue that the world would end if we all decided to mine for oil at the same time. It probably would, but it's not going to happen, so to hell with your reducto ad absurdum arguments.
EDIT: HH said it all more concisely and better, the git. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 21, 2010, 19:38:12 by LeftLibertarian »
|
|
|
|
|
Happy Hornet
King

Posts: 3724
Free Speaker
|
You might as well argue that the world would end if we all decided to mine for oil at the same time. It probably would, but it's not going to happen, so to hell with your reducto ad absurdum arguments.
And what is it with people going to Blackpool?
What if we ALL went to Blackpool at the same time? There would be chaos!
Nobody would be working, the economy would collapse, law and order would break down.
Damn fine, watertight argument for not going to Blackpool I think you'll agree.
EDIT: HH said it all more concisely and better, the git.
If it's any consolation this type of thing is exceedingly rare, you were just very unlucky. |
|
|
|
|
stonefish
King

Posts: 4381

Free Speaker
|
Well a gay man could have a child with a woman same as a straight man could any time he wanted, ditto a gay woman with a straight man. Yep love the way morals and principles have progressed in society just so we can have what we want |
|
|
|
|
Happy Hornet
King

Posts: 3724
Free Speaker
|
Yep love the way morals and principles have progressed in society just so we can have what we want
Did I recomend it as morally desireable course of action? |
|
|
|
|
|
|